“One's destination is never a place but rather a new way of looking at things.”
Henry Miller
The above quote from Henry Miller is a perfect axiom of what I have learnt so far in ICT. The knowledge that I gained was not all new; I knew what a Wiki was, I had read blogs before, I had read about Pavlov and behaviourism previously. The way in which Wiki’s, blogs and mobile phones could be applied to teaching, and the thought that I, as a teacher, could impart with more than mere knowledge, that I could and will teach my students to think, is a new way of looking at teaching - a liberating thought.
The learning theories that we internalised played a very important role in the reflections in our blogs and thus I would like to spend some time summarising what I concluded on the learning theories from doing all the activities.
When analyzing the activities in the context of the learning theories of behaviorism, constructivism, cognitivism and connectivism it is clear that there are elements of each within all the wiki and blog activities that we did.
Behaviourism, as per Mergel (1998) is “based on observable changes in behavior”. In our activities such observable changes in our behaviour is evident. We created a blog and we participated in wiki activities.
Cognitive learning took place in the way that the course gave us practise in posting our reflections to our blog and participating in various discussions in the Wiki.
The largest part of the learning was in the learning theories of constructivism and connectivism.
The constructivism part of the activities was set in the structured analytical part of the activities where we looked at different readings though a structured analytical tool such as (de Bono) 6 Thinking Hats, PMI and SWOT analysis. The learning was a dynamic process of contracting knowledge within a certain context instead of reading or learning off by heart.
In the social part of the activities, learning was acquired from many different opinions on a particular subject; the wiki space being a dynamic place to apply this type of learning in a very short space of time.
The connectivism lies in the fact that 62 student were using digital means to connect to each other and to the wiki on Learning Theories and mobile phone wiki. When considering some of (Siemens, 2004) Principals of Connectivism:
- · Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources.
- · Learning may reside in non-human appliances.
- · Capacity to know more is more critical than what is currently known
- · Nurturing and maintaining connections is needed to facilitate continual learning.
It is clear that we have had elements of connectivism in each of our activities.
When constructing any e-learning activity attention should be paid to the learning theories to ensure that the activity has the elements of the learning theory that will create the results with the students that is intended.
All the learning theories, and the fact that everybody has a different learning style, is brought together by the design of an E-learning framework. The idea of combining Blooms Taxonomy (Clark, 1999) with the Theory of Engagement (Shneiderman & Kearsley, 1999) is pure brilliance. The idea of creating students who are higher order thinkers who are actively, and socially engaged at the same time, is innovative.
Graphic representation of my E-learning Design Framework.
In my practice I shall take these two theories and add to that collaboration on a global level. I would like my students to relate not just to his or her own communities, but also with the world at large. I shall involve specialists in the areas of learning, and particular areas that we are investigating, and have them work with the students in Wiki’s collaborating work. I would also like to see a classroom where we connect with students worldwide; we have so much to learn from each other, starting with our neighbour and reaching out nationally and globally to the other nations and cultures. In this way learning transcends time and space.
I would like each student to understand their strengths and weaknesses in terms of their unique learning profiles. Each student would complete several learning profile questionnaires during the year, which they will share with each other. I believe it assists understanding if a student and the facilitator are aware of what type of learning profile the student is. As an example if you know a student has a strong preference for visual learning I would rather give the student a diagram of the learning as opposed to many words. Profiles are a guide only, students’ profiles do change with different environments, subject of learning, moods and even just over time so care should be taken not to label a student as a certain type of learner, it should be used as an awareness only.
The students will leave school having gained experience and not just the basic 3 R’s but also a broader all-encompassing knowledge. They must be able to prove that they have this experience by presenting a portfolio of projects in which they have donated back to the community and world. In doing so they will have acquired leadership skills, project management skills, problem solving techniques and of course, the ability to procure knowledge that they need at the time that it is required. These skills will be taken with them to the workplace and immediately an employer has an employee that he can deploy into the workforce.
An interesting conclusion that I come to whilst doing these activities, is how suited blogs, wiki’s, and ICTs in general, are to diverse students. The one form of diversity that especially crossed my mind is that of ADHD children. If blogs were used by teachers to post the day’s work and to post a list of homework tasks these children would always have access to it. I am sure, not even the most ADHD child can manage to lose the World Wide Web!
In summary, all that we learnt needs to be connected together like a huge multi facetted Rubik’s cube and then used to effectively fill the empty spaces with wiki’s and blogs to create higher order thinking students. A blog, wiki or any ICT is just an empty space. You, as the facilitator of learning, need to decide how this empty space should be filled and which tools should be used to facilitate learning in which space of ICT. As an example, in our activity we used the PMI tool with a partner to analyse the learning theory articles using the empty space of a wiki and filled it with articles and the learnings from all the students in the course. Just reading the articles without actively participating in the activity of a PMI, would have got us to read the articles and forget what we read a day later. Without proper pedagogy the spaces will remain empty, they may be full of visual clutter but if they don’t somehow challenge and change a student, create more synapses in the students’ brain or give them a skill they can use, there is no point to the space, still nothing meaningful occupying that space.

Graphic representation of filling empty space of ICT with effective and efficient pedagogy
In conclusion, the above observations, learnings and thoughts inspires me to pose the following questions to myself:
How will I ensure that I use a range of ICT together with effective and efficient digital pedagogies to enhance student learning?
How will I ensure that I always do engage my students?
How do I make sure that I am not the one making students leave their interactive mobiles at home?
What methods are there for me to use to assess my proficiency as a facilitator of learning?
Clark, D. R. (1999, June 5). Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains. Retrieved March 10, 2011 from Big Dog & Little Dog's Performance Juxtaposit: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html#cognitive
Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. Electronic Journal e-Learning Volume 6 Issue 2 2008 , (119 - 130).
de Bono, E. (n.d.). Six Thinking Hats®. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from de Bono Thinking Systems: http://www.debonothinkingsystems.com/tools/6hats.htm
Henry Miller. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved March 16, 2011, from BrainyQuote.com Web site: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henrymille133854.html
Mergel, B. (2008, May). Instructional Design & Learning Theory. Retrieved March 12, 2011 from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.htm#The%20Basics%20of%20Behaviorism
Shneiderman, B., & Kearsley, G. (1999, May 4). Engagement Theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved March 9, 2011 from Sprynet.com: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Siemens, G. (2004, December 12). Connectivism. Retrieved March 12, 2011 from Elearnspace everything elearning: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Comments
An excellent reflective blog Heleen. Your reflections clearly indicate your participation in the activities. You have explored links between connectivism, multiple intelligences and learning styles, which provide you with a richer and stronger background knowledge of e-Learning design. In your conclusion you drew together the core ideas of scaffolding, and identified how appropriate scaffolds are designed to support higher order thinking as a “thinking routine” that is recognisable by students and transferrable to other situations. Your blog reflections were academically referenced, and your conclusion was well structured, paragraphed and referenced in consistent academic style.
Tutor: Robyn Petersen Date: 28 March 2011.